Rule 32 - Discovery
Rule 32.2.3 - Objections to Interrogatories
1. Objections to interrogatories shall be stated with factual specificity and shall concisely set forth the reasons wherein and why the interrogatory is objectionable. Setting out abstract objections, such as, but not limited to, "burdensome", "overboard", "irrelevant", "privileged", "work product", with no further discussion of wherein and why the interrogatory is objectionable on such grounds is not in compliance with this rule and Such objections will not be considered by the Court.
10/23/87